PLM versus BIM - Similarities and Dissimilarities

In fact, PLM and BIM domains are moderately self-reliant. Previously the construction companies maintain PLM towards systemizing the data alias model for a mutual understanding connecting various project stakeholders.

 

Construction companies may be reluctant to employ a PLM system because authorship of data remains indistinguishable in comparison with manufacturing companies every regulation or department in PLM should be another company within the construction industry.

 

Collaboration of Data amid people with diverse authorship and the intention for working with data is something that can make awareness for PLM and BIM. Simultaneously there may be several differentiations.

 

Considering technology and data deliveries, we are now adopting new technology for storing data in the cloud. Large numbers of data can perish in the future with single collaborative cloud data platform for performing diversified calculations and procedures.

So the technology skilled people will embrace PLM and BIM to take the advantage for an extended integrated platform. At the same time there exits several discriminations concerning data, terminology, processing and more.

 

So you have to get some clear ideas on what are most significant 3 common similarities and dissimilarities of PLM and BIM.

 

Top 3 similarities:

 

• Data Sharing. Both PLM and BIM solutions necessitates to distribute and gather a collective set of 3D and 2D product as well as project data involving diverse roles and access requirements. Data can be owned by the same organization or various organizations.
• Project management. One can discover some specifics amid distinct manufacturing and building projects, but one has to arrange people and teams around deliveries and timeline.
• Visualization. Both PLM and BIM are identical to envisage the objects. One prefers to observe and experience any project virtually prior to commencement of actual project in the jobsite. It is also applicable for clash/conflict detection.

 

Top 3 differentiations:

 

• Single model. There may be huge difference in dealing with several Bill of Materials (EBOM, MBOM, etc.) vs. diverse elements of information concerning building (architecture, construction, equipment, etc.)
• Processes and changes. There may also be considerable difference in the systems through which the changes and data integrity are preserved among manufacturing product development and construction projects. Several specific models, data definitions, reporting, updates and many other specific won't permit to apply a single solution to maintain both manufacturing (PLM) and construction (BIM) domains.
• Tools, Apps and terminology. PLM and BIM together stand for almost dissimilar set of programs for design, planning, etc. They also come up with particular language and terminology.

 

Conclusion: There may be some similarities regarding tech and computing infrastructure in the future between PLM and BIM implementations. As we adopt cloud based solution, there may be some reprocesses for sharing of multidisciplinary solutions with data management, project organization, visualization, mobile access, etc. However, both manufacturing (PLM) and construction (BIM) industries will maintain particular data organization, processes and terminological distinctions that can lead to diversity in solution delivery.